Criticism as a defense mechanism: Don’t let it stop you from greatness!

“There is only one way to avoid criticism: do nothing, say nothing, and be nothing.” -Aristotle

“Criticism is a natural by-product of success. Welcome it!”

 

“Would you like to donate $1 to Muscular Dystrophy Research?”

I think I was at Safeway when I was asked this question. Or was it Carl’s Jr.? Or was it Taco Bell? Or was it Roth’s?
Oh, right, it was probably all of them.

“No, thank you.” But then my inner pretend-sociologist kicked in. “Hey, out of curiosity, when someone says no, how do they usually respond?” I asked the clerk.

She half-smiled, half-sighed. With an exasperated look, she answered my question. “Oh, lots of different ways. Sometimes they tell me their life story, and why they can’t donate. Sometimes, they list off all of the other things that they donate money to. Sometimes, they actually get frustrated at me just for asking! I’m just like ‘It’s okay to say no! It’s fine, I’m not judging you!’”

 

(Sidenote: Generosity is a hard topic for me to blog about, because of Jesus’s teachings on it. If I’m not generous, then I feel ashamed and I have to hide the fact that I’m not generous. But if I am generous, then Jesus basically tells me to shut up about it. So you can never know whether I’m generous or stingy, because I won’t tell you. Oh well.)

 

Here’s what I found so interesting in her response: Why would anyone get mad at Safeway for doing a good thing? “Oh, there’s probably a few people, not too many.” But no, the Safeway clerk said otherwise. It’s common, strangely. Even if they don’t get mad, they get defensive.

 

THE SUCCESS OF OTHERS MAKES US MAD

What we found here was this, and ask any clerk who has asked anyone to donate a dollar to (insert non-profit here) if this is true or not: A successful fundraiser/action/donation/etc. draws out a defensive reaction from people. Why?

 

Actually, I’ve come to find it’s much bigger than just fundraisers.

 

Any success, whether moral/financial/business/personal, draws out a defensive reaction from people. And that is often where criticism comes from.

 

In fact, think about this! If somebody takes a good, selfless, charitable action, such that a critic couldn’t find anything wrong with it, the critic falls back on this tried and true tactic: suggesting a different good action that the person should have taken, in lieu of the one that they did!
For example, have you ever heard this classic line at church? “Missions, missions, missions. All this talk about missions. We have plenty of needs right here in our neighborhood. What about those?”

Are you kidding me? As though donating to missions or doing missions work is a bad thing or something?

Nobody is shouting it from the rooftops…but I’m going to venture a dangerous guess that will never be confirmed or denied. What do you want to bet that the person who brings up this criticism is not donating money to either domestic needs or missions work?

It is simply that the call to action, and the celebration of others’ good actions, draws a defensive reaction from people.

 

We could go for hours with examples. But what I want to point out is that in all aspects of our lives, success draws criticism.

Publicly gush about how great your wife is on Facebook? You’re showboating. Showing off your marriage. I’ll bet you have issues that you’re hiding. Who you trying to impress?

Gush about your kids? “Oh, just wait until they’re teenagers. You’re in for it.”

Make money and buy yourself something? “Oh, that money SHOULD have been spent like blah-blah-blah”

Make money and do something good with it? “Oh, I don’t know why you’re donating money to X when you could be donating money to Y.”

 

THE WORST PART: WHEN THE RESULT OF CRITICISM IS INACTION

Those who take action or go public in any way open themselves up for criticism. It is unavoidable.

But this is what I believe to be the biggest tragedy: When somebody, somewhere, doesn’t take a good action for fear of being criticized. And I believe that this does, in fact, happen.

I always liked to answer questions and ask questions in youth group growing up, in Bible studies, etc. But then, as we talked about Pharisees and about how they loved to be seen by men, it caused a question to cross my mind…

“Carson, what if you’re raising your hand just to be seen? Just for attention?”

It was a good question. I mean, I’m not shy…I do enjoy the limelight. I do enjoy the attention. So does that mean I need to put my hand down? And stop talking?

Just as I was considering stepping back a little bit, someone talked to me. “Hey, I like the questions you ask, and your thoughts. I’m always glad when you show up for the Bible study.”

So I made the decision that day: For me to not raise my hand because people might perceive me as too attention grabby? That concern about how others would perceive me was, in fact, actually self-centered. When there is a good thing to be done, good words to say, then I should take the action. Haters gonna hate.

 

CRITICS THINK IN ISOLATED INCIDENTS, INSTEAD OF THE PROBABILITY OF MULTIPLE SUCCESSES

 

I was reading an article about “second-level thinking” (whatever that means…I’m still learning about it) and there was a new concept I hadn’t thought about before. “First level thinking deals with isolated incidents, second level thinking deals with probabilities.”

If I suggested a change to how we run our martial arts school, then good thinkers would not just “accept” it. However, the “first-level” thinker would think of that one person who wouldn’t like the change, and why they wouldn’t like it. The “second-level” thinker might think the same thing, but they would think “okay, how often is that concern likely to come up, and do we gain more than we are likely to lose if that concern comes up often?”

Therefore, according to this concept, the “first-level thinker” would let that one person, that one possibility, that one criticism, stop them. The second-level thinker doesn’t go in blindly, but it takes more than one kink to stop them.

 

OUR MASTERY OF OURSELVES, OUR WORDS, HAS AN ACTUAL EFFECT ON PEOPLE.

To the dreamer/fighter/entrepreneur in all of us: Don’t let the critic get you down. And, in fact, don’t even try to avoid criticism. Choose who you want to be and go dominated it. Know that you WILL get criticized, and that if you aren’t getting criticized, you aren’t accomplishing anything.

To the critic in all of us, and yes, I know it’s present within me: Any of us can be careless instead of careful with our words. Here’s what I know…I don’t want to be the one who stopped someone from doing something great because they didn’t want to be criticized by me.

I don’t want anybody to hold back or not try something because they thought they would look silly or stupid in my eyes. I want to be someone who spurs people to take action and try new things, not someone who inhibits them and makes them feel self-conscious.

 

“And let us consider how we may spur one another on toward love and good deeds.” Hebrews 10:24 (NIV)

 

“Therefore encourage one another and build each other up, just as in fact you are doing.” 1 Thessalonians 5:11 (NIV)

Politics, history, and me: Why I am breaking my political silence

Throughout the Bush vs. Gore election, the Bush vs. Kerry election, the Obama vs. McCain election, and the Obama vs. Romney election, I chose to remain silent about my political views (Before that, I was too young to vote and not old enough to care). There were three reasons for this…

  1. I did not make the time to research or read about it, so I did not want to push any opinion of mine because it wasn’t really solidified or backed up.
  2. As a Christian who doesn’t hide it: I represent Christ and His gospel. Politics were not important enough to me to make enemies. I have always wanted to be someone who people felt comfortable asking religious questions to, regardless of their position or stance. Making my political stance loud would’ve muddied the waters. The Gospel is a higher priority than politics.
  3. I have been a martial arts instructor ever since I was 14. I was taught that I was in the public eye. So if my political stance damaged my relationships with students and families, then it really wasn’t worth it.

 

However, this last week I broke that rule, more than ever. I made it loud and clear that I am anti-Trump. I didn’t do that before because I believed that politics weren’t worth making enemies over. They definitely weren’t worth interfering with the Gospel, and I didn’t want my political views to change the way that students and families saw me as an instructor. But this time, it’s different. Why?

Self-analysis time. Is this election really so different? If I was quiet over Obama, why couldn’t I be quiet over Trump? Am I saying that speaking out against Trump is worth interfering with the Gospel? What heresy is that? Even our worst presidents haven’t “destroyed” our nation. So won’t this be “just another president” after this election?

 

So because I have chosen to break my political science, I figure I owe it to anyone interested in my writings enough to backtrack and expand upon where I am coming from, and how my political beliefs are shaped by my other beliefs. Hence, a blog series.

 

I own my bias, rather than pretending it away

A great teacher at Corban said this, and I will never forget it. “Many classrooms tell you to check your Christianity at the door. Let me tell you that you can’t. Bring your Christianity to the debate.” Dr. Kendrick, at Salem Bible College (Now Salem Bible College of Northwest University), said it somewhat like this: “I am a Pentecostal. So I see things like a Pentecostal. I am not going to pretend I’m not a Pentecostal.”

The idea is that rather than striving for being “unbiased,” if we own the fact that we are biased by our position, we can then see other positions more clearly because we are grappling with our bias. If we pursue “neutrality,” then we think we’re being objective when really, our thoughts are influenced by our upbringing, setting, preference, etc. Nobody thinks in a vacuum. We are all influenced by our surroundings.

So the purpose of these posts is to expose my bias. Where I’m coming from. What I value. What I don’t value. Who taught me. Who’s teachings I accepted. Who’s teachings I rejected.

 

It actually won’t be so much about a candidate, but rather, about people and society in general.

 

By the way, I promise I’m not being too egotistical, like saying “I know that all of you are SOOOOOOOO interested in what I have to say.” Rather, this is for anybody out there who is interested in what I have to say. This is my best attempt at spelling it out.

An analysis of people with important opinions

Super simple theory. I’m still developing it and watching, so tell me if you notice this, too!

We all know some people who are controlled and directed by the opinions of others, to varying degrees. We also know some people who can shrug off people’s opinions like nothing.

We also know people who are opinionated, who talk a lot about what they think. They wouldn’t admit to pushing their opinions upon others, but if you disagree with them, they get defensive.

Here is my discovery, my proposed theory: The two are tied together.

People who hold their own opinions as important are the people who get upset when others think lowly or ill about them. People who are able to shrug off another person’s opinion are also the most likely to recognize their opinion as just their opinion.

This is the theory I am running with. Do you guys agree? Disagree?

…I really want to know what you think. It’s really important to me. But if you disagree, then I’ll be mad at you and I’ll call you a stupidface. Because my opinion is awesome and I’m right.